TURMEL: Vexatious Litigant Appeal Tues 9:30 180 Queen St. W. Toronto So my appeal against being declared a vexatious litigant is Tues Sep 26 2023 9:30am at 180 Queen St. W. Toronto. I'll also ask if my a vexatious litigant bars others from filing my templates. The court is going to have to find that 1) I filed repeated actions against the CRTC not to get quantitatively equitable free time in partisan political debates but to vex them. 2)a) I filed actions against banks not to abolish interest rates for the good of humanity but to vex them; c)b) I used templates not to help foreclosed debtors avoid eviction but to vex the banks. 3) I sued Dragons Den not because they libeled me but to vex them. 4)a) I filed many actions to strike the prohibitions on cannabis forcing the Crown to stay 4,000 possession charges in 2002 not because it was a valuable medication but to vex the Crown; b) I published self-defence templates not to help those charged avoid criminal records but to vex the Crown; c) I published templates not to help those who had had their permits cancelled by the Court to get their permits back but to vex the Crown; c) I published templates not to help those who had their permits stalled get damages for lost rent and pot, and expedite delivery if not yet processed, but to vex the Crown; d) I published templates not to help high dosers strike down the 150-gram cap imposed by the court but to vex the Crown. e) I published templates not to help patients oppose - Failure to provide juice and oil; - annual authorization for permanent illnesses; - Cap on patients per grower and licenses per site 5) I published templates not help people avoid restrictions for the Covid false alarm but to vex the Crown. I was hit with $3000 in court costs and the other 80 were hit with $500 each. So I started a GiveSendGo to help pay the costs of those who tried to warn the world Covid was a false alarm needing no vax: http://givesendgo.com/covidfalsealarmcourtcosts As you can see, these are all good deeds and I'm proud of them all. None are frivolous and n one vexatious. Only one was vexatious. In 1977, I had been busted and convicted as Ottawa's Gambling Crusader for trying to run legal blackjack games. Then in 1978, the Supreme Court Rockert decision ruled a 1-night stand was not a gaming house because it did not impugn the reputation of the neighborhood. So I started running transient disco-casino all around town. So the Crown charged me with possession of a gambling device, the cards, and Judge Bernie Ryan said "it made anyone who played a game in his home guilty" before fining me $200 as the last person in Canadian history convicted of possession of a deck of cards. So to vex them, I laid an information against Simpsons Sears for possessing cards for sale. I was only vexing them back. So let's see if the court decides that all my actions were not good deeds to help victims but only to vex the Crown. The whole Memorandum is at http://SmartestMan.Ca/s40fcam.pdf We'll find out if I can't do any more good deeds helping victims of government oppression.