TURMEL: Judge Horne decision on premature Order on Costs JCT: On Jun 19, Case Management Judge Horne issued an Order dismissing the actions of the 75 other plaintiffs pending my appeals: http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4.pdf https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/dock-regi-eng.aspx?cas=40520 is the docket info for my Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court denied by Justices Richard Wagner, Andromache Karakatsanis, Suzanne Cote, Malcolm Rowe, Sheilah L. Martin, Nicholas Kasirer, Mahmud Jamal, Michelle O'Bonsawin on May 11. The Motion to Reconsider was filed June 12 and is now pending. So it's pretty obvious that my case isn't yet finished and Judge Horne's decision to dismiss the 75 actions of the other plaintiffs pending my appeals are done must be premature. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19154.txt is the report on Ray Turmel filing a motion for Judge Horne to reconsider TURMEL: Judge Horne prematurely dismisses Covid damages actions http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4n.pdf http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19155.txt is the report on the Crown objecting to me, a vexatious litigant, helping Ray when I was barred from helping people. TURMEL: Crown objects to Turmel helping Covid plaintiffs http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4nc.pdf http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19157.txt is my report on the Direction from Judge Horne: TURMEL: Judge Horne decision on premature Order on Costs http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4nj.pdf Federal Court CANADA 180 Queen Street West Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M5V 3L6 June 28, 2023 VIA EMAIL Raymond Turmel James Schneider DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RE: T-138-21 RAYMOND TURMEL v. HIS MAJESTY THE KING Please be advised of the following oral direction of Associate Judge Trent Horne dated June 28, 2023: "The plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration of my order of June 19, 2023 on the basis that John Turmel has brought a motion to the Supreme Court of Canada to reconsider the decision on his leave to appeal. The motion record does not include an affidavit, and does not include evidence related to any motion at the Supreme Court. JCT: Of course, the docket info is at the Supreme Court site but when Ray filed the motion, it did not yet show the Motion for Reconsideration. Now it does. And the reason I Ray didn't file an affidavit is because it would have taken too much running around to find a notary in rural Quebec where he lives. So I used my standard blurb asking the judge to dispense with any documents he would allow. The defendant, by letter dated June 23, 2023, requests that the motion be removed from the Court file on the grounds that the motion record identifies no basis on which the Court could reconsider the June 19, 2023 order, JCT: What is the fact my appeals are not yet finished if not basis to reconsider the Order? and that it appears the motion was prepared and distributed by John Turmel. Rule 74 provides that an order to remove a document from the Court file can only be made if all interested parties have been given an opportunity to make submissions. John Turmel has been declared to be a vexatious litigant (Canada (Attorney General) v Turmel, 2022 FC 1526). The Court's judgment, among other things, states that "Mr. Turmel is prohibited from assisting others with any proceedings before this Court, including by filing materials, or purporting to represent them, or communicating with the Court on their behalf." The affidavit of service for the reconsideration motion in T138-21 was sworn by John Turmel. The defendant's correspondence includes an email from John Turmel to counsel for the defendant stating "I'm filing for reconsideration of the decision until it's over at the top." The font and style of the documents for the motion in T-138-21 is somewhat unique, and the same as the documents filed by John Turmel in T-130-21 and T-277-22. This gives the appearance that John Turmel is directly assisting the plaintiff in T-138-21. JCT: There is no mention that Vexatious Litigant Order is now being appealed to the Court of Appeal so I'm not sure if the Order is valid until the appeal process is done. If it's not, then I may be punished. Sad because I just wanted to inform Judge Horne that my appeals were not yet complete and might have just sent him a letter rather than a motion from Ray. Raymond Turmel shall therefore be given an opportunity to make submissions as to why the reconsideration motion in T-138-21 should not be removed from the Court file. The submissions must specifically address the extent, if at all, that John Turmel provided assistance with the preparation and filing of the reconsideration motion. Any such submissions shall be served and filed by July 14, 2023. Any responding submissions shall be served and filed by July 28, 2023. None of the deadlines in this or related proceedings are suspended or otherwise affected by this direction. If Raymond Turmel does not serve and file submissions by July 14, 2023, the reconsideration motion shall be removed from the Court file". Sincerely, Cherlin McColman Registry Officer JCT: There seems to be no purpose to pushing him to reconsider asking everyone to submit as to costs by today. So I guess it will be removed from the Court file. But at least Judge Horne knows that it's not over and he's given himself an extra few weeks to see what the Supreme Court does before he rules on costs. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19151.txt is the report on my motion to the Supreme Court citing the exceptionally rare circumstances of the SmartestManOnEarth.Ca, http://SmartestMan.Ca/ for short, Canada's Mr. Spock, explaining now excess deaths going through the roof around the world can be corrected to save the most. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19a3tr.pdf