TURMEL: Judge Horne prematurely dismisses Covid damages actions JCT: Case Management Judge Mandy Aylen struck my action seeking a declaration that Covid Mortality Hyped Hundredfold was a false alarm and any Covid mitigation restrictions would be unconstitutional and damages due to lockdown for a false alarm because I needed a federal restriction on me which I did not have. She couldn't set the precedent of declaring any restriction would be. She stayed the actions of the other 75 plaintiffs who joined me in seeking the declaration and damages pending the exhaustion of my appeals. Judge Horne was then appointed to replace Judge Aylen as Case Management Judge. On May 11 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed my Application for Leave to Appeal. Usually, that ends it but in exceedingly rare circumstances, a motion for reconsideration is allowed. Given excess deaths are going through the roof around the world and I'm the SmartestManOnEarth.Ca, http://SmartestMan.Ca for short, I wanted them to set the precedent and declare Covid Mortality Hyped Hundredfold as a false alarm and any Covid mitigation restrictions would be unconstitutional. So I filed a motion for reconsideration by the Supreme Court of Canada. But Judge Horne was not aware. So the other 75 plaintiffs received an Order dismissing their actions, with brother Ray Turmel as Lead Plaintiff, and giving them 10 days to make submissions as to costs. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4.pdf JCT: I thought I had sent the Registry an announcement that there was going to be a Motion to Reconsider. But maybe it wasn't passed along. So Lead Plaintiff Ray Turmel filed a motion for Judge Horne to reconsider his Jun 19 2023 Order given my appeals were not yet exhausted: http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4n.pdf File: T-138-21 BETWEEN: RAYMOND TURMEL Applicant/Plaintiff And HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent/Defendant NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Pursuant to Rule 397(1)) TAKE NOTICE THAT the Plaintiff, Raymond Turmel, will make a motion to Case Management Judge Horne in writing under Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules. Lead Plaintiff Ray Turmel filed a motion for Judge Horne to reconsider his Order given my appeals were not yet exhausted: THE MOTION IS FOR an Order to Reconsider the Court's Jun 19 2023 Order and that such decision on my and other claims be adjourned pending the final determination of the Turmel Motion to Reconsider in the Supreme Court? AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging the time or mode of service or dispensing with any documents or amending any error or omission which this Honourable Court may allow. THE GROUNDS ARE THAT a motion to the Supreme Court of Canada to reconsider the dismissal of the John Turmel application for leave to appeal has been filed for exceptionally rare circumstances and so the decision to strike the John Turmel Statement of Claim T-130-21 is not yet final. Dated at Grenville-sur-la-Rouge on Jun 22 2023. Raymond Turmel To: James Schneider WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS 1. The Court Order stated: [1] On or about May 16, 2023, I issued the following direction in these proceedings: These actions have been stayed pending the final determination of the proceedings in T-130-21 (the proceeding commenced by John Turmel). The statement of claim in T-130-21 was struck, without leave to amend, by prothonotary Aylen (as she then was, as that office was then titled) on July 12, 2021. Her decision was upheld on appeal (Turmel v Canada, 2021 FC 1095). A further appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed (Turmel v Canada, 2022 FCA 166). Mr Turmel's application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed (John Turmel v. His Majesty the King, 2023 CanLII 39581 (SCC)). The decision in T-130-21 to strike the statement of claim is therefore final. THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The statements of claim in Court file T-138-21, and each of the Court files listed in Annex A to this order, are struck, without leave to amend. 2. His Majesty the King, the defendant in T-138-21 and each of the Court files listed in Annex A to this order, shall serve and file submissions as to costs within 10 days of the date of this order, not to exceed 5 pages. Any responding submissions as to costs from the plaintiffs in T-138-21 and each of the Court files listed in Annex A to this order shall be served and filed within 20 days of the date of this order, not to exceed 5 pages. 2. A motion to the Supreme Court of Canada to reconsider the dismissal of the John Turmel application for leave to appeal for exceptionally rare circumstances has been filed and so the decision to strike the John Turmel Statement of Claim T- 138-21 is not yet final. 3. Applicant seeks an Order to adjourn the final decision herein pending the final determination of the Turmel Motion to Reconsider in the Supreme Court? Dated at Grenville-sur-la-Rouge on Jun 22 2023. Raymond Turmel JCT: If Judge Horne doesn't correct the premature order, then I'll get one of the plaintiffs to file an argument for no costs by the 29th. Only 1 person rather than have everyone fill out a template makes less work for the Crown and the Court, especially since I've been declared a vexatious litigant and can't publish templates any more. The Federal Court of Appeal Justice Laskin also just declared me a Vexatious Litigant before my appeal of the Vexatious Litigant declaration by the Federal Court. So I've had to ask them to reconsider: http://SmartestMan.Ca/s40rn.pdf