TURMEL: Fed Court of Appeal won't declare Covid False Alarm Facebook banned me from posting at Apple Orange Resistance because of my announcement of the Oct 4 Federal Court of Appeal hearing of the Aylen appeal. Here is my report on it. JCT: The appeal of the Aylen and Zinn decisions was heard before Federal Court of Appeal Madame Gleason, Madame MacTavish and Madame Monaghan at 2pm Oct 4 2022 at 180 Queen St. W. in Toronto. I got the make the case that the Covid Mortality was a False Alarm after being hyped a hundredfold! Then I pointed out that the mRNA vaccine was not only not effective but was also not safe. I noted Canadians were still living under restrictions and many were still be coerced to take the clot-shot for the False Alarm. I wanted them to set a precedent and rule that any and all restrictions based on a False Alarm were unconstitutional and save the remainder from being coerced by mandates. They said no. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19a3aj.pdf is their reasons for not warning the world that vaccines were not needed for Covid that was a false alarm: Date: 20221004 Docket: A-286-21 Citation: 2022 FCA 166 CORAM: GLEASON J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. MONAGHAN J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN TURMEL Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 4, 2022. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 4, 2022. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MONAGHAN J.A. Date: 20221004 Docket: A-286-21 Citation: 2022 FCA 166 CORAM: GLEASON J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. MONAGHAN J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN TURMEL Appellant And HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 4, 2022). MONAGHAN J.A. [1] The appellant, John Turmel, appeals a decision of the Federal Court (2021 FC 1095) dismissing his appeal of an order of the Case Management Judge striking his statement of claim in its entirety, without leave to amend and with costs. [2] The Federal Court followed this Court's decision in Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215 (Hospira), and identified the appellate standard of review from Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, as the standard to be applied in its review of the Case Management Judge's order. [3] Applying that standard, the Federal Court could find no reviewable error in the Case Management Judge's decision, agreeing with her observations regarding the lack of facts necessary to support the appellant's claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, her observations on the law, and her conclusion that the claim as drafted is an abuse of process. [4] This Court can allow the appeal only if we are satisfied that the Federal Court made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in refusing to interfere with the Case Management Judge's decision: Hospira, at para. 84. Contrary to Mr. Turmel's submission, it was not open to the Case Management Judge or the Federal Court to disregard the applicable law and it is similarly not open to us to do so. [5] We see no error in the decision below and accordingly we will dismiss the appeal with costs, fixed in the all- inclusive amount of $1,500.00. "K.A. Siobhan Monaghan" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ZINN DATED OCTOBER 18, 2021, DOCKET NO. T-130-21 DOCKET: A-286-21 STYLE OF CAUSE: JOHN TURMEL v. HIS MAJESTY THE KING PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 4, 2022 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: GLEASON J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. MONAGHAN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: MONAGHAN J.A. APPEARANCES: John Turmel FOR THE APPELLANT (ON HIS OWN BEHALF) James Schneider FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: A. Francois Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT JCT: Pretty good reasons to let millions more get the kill shot. Or not. Maybe they won't be overturned in this life but I'd bet the afterlife among their victims who took the shot after Oct 4 2022 won't be so t much fun. he Crown asked for $1,500 costs and I responded that was cheap for an attempt to save millions from the pharma-cabal. Wonder what it feels like to go home after having let millions have their health harmed? http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19 has our Federal Court of Canada Statement of Claim detailing how WHO compared the Covid 3.4% CFR "Case Fatality Rate" Apple not to Flu's known 10% CFR "Apple" but to its 100-times smaller 0.1% IFR "Infection Fatality Rate" "Orange." "Covid Mortality Hyped hundredfold" is the book at Amazon! https://www.amazon.com/dp/b09dfgld8d Over 80 self-represented plaintiffs filed claims asking the Court to declare that Covid was a false alarm and declare any restrictions or vaccine mandates unconstitutional. The judges wouldn't let it be heard and slapped us with court costs for trying to warn the world. Over 30 million Canadians have taken the clot shot since then. If you don't think we should be punished for trying to warn the world that Covid was a false alarm, see the video and thank us at GoFundMe to pay our costs for trying to warn you Covid was a false alarm and save you from being forced to take the myocarditis shot. https://www.gofundme.com/f/9cqfvq-federal-court-of-canada-covid-false-alarm-costs https://rumble.com/v1jzi3l-gofundme-for-federal-court-of-canada-covid-false-alarm-costs.html https://youtu.be/VNIBCftQ_-U I've just suffered another $1,500 cost for having tried to warn the world no need for vaccines for a false alarm. Any help would be noted and appreciated.