TURMEL: Alim Manji gets 20 Air Travel Ban Self-Plaintiffs

JCT: Alim Manji was one of the 75 self-represented 
plaintiffs in the first Covid Challenge against "any" 
restriction and is the first to sign on to the new challenge 
against the air travel restriction with me. 

He just got his second Gold Star souvenir and has provide a 
picture of him with his souvenir. 
http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19balim.jpg 

He signed up 4 of his friends and the Crown wrote the court: 

Department of Justice Canada
Ontario Regional Office
National Litigation Sector

VIA E-FILING Our File Number: LEX-500081718

April 7, 2021

Federal Court
180 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario M5V 1Z4

Attention: Registrar

Dear Sir/Madam:

Re: FUDGE, Joshua v Her Majesty the Queen, T-693-22
BEAULIEU, Rene v Her Majesty the Queen, T-695-22
TAMM, Rosa v Her Majesty the Queen, T-710-22
KROEPLIN, Angela Colella v Her Majesty the Queen, T-705-22

JCT: It's funny but the Crown forgot Alim! T-694-22! 

CR: On behalf of the defendant in the above-noted matters, 
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada ("Canada"), I am 
writing to request that these matters, as well as any future 
claims that are substantially identical to these matters, 
continue as specially managed proceedings.

JCT: The main difference being that this time we have the 
air travel restriction to challenge while the last time, we 
had no actual restrictions to challenge and challenged 
"any!"

CR: The statements of claim in these matters are virtually 
identical to the John Turmel v Her Majesty the Queen claim 
(Court File No.: T-227-22) (the "John Turmel Claim"), which 
is currently being case managed by Prothonotary Horne. 

JCT: Which they do not want to proceed without my putting 
down a security deposit for costs which I can't do! 

CR: The claims appear to be based on templates available for
download from the website http://smartestman.ca/c19bins.pdf  

The self-represented plaintiffs allege that the Interim 
Order Respecting Certain Requirements for Civil Aviation Due 
to COVID-19, No. 52 is ultra vires the Aeronautics Act and 
unjustifiably infringes section 6 of the Charter.

Canada also requests that these matters, as well as any 
future claims that are substantially identical to these 
matters, be stayed pursuant to section 50(1)(b) of the 
Federal Courts Act pending the final determination of the 
John Turmel Claim. 

JCT: He wants to stall plaintiffs with no costs owed while 
my case does not get heard because of costs owed. What will 
he do if I abandon my action?

CR: This approach was implemented by the Court in another 
set of virtually identical claims based on templates created 
by Mr. Turmel (Court File No.: T-130-22). 1 The Court 
allowed parties who believed that the final determination of 
the lead claim should not apply to their claim to 
requisition a case management conference to schedule a 
motion to determine whether their action should move forward 
within 30 days of the final determination of the lead claim.

JCT: Here, he doesn't want their issues to be dealt with on 
the merits while getting my action struck not on the merits. 

CR: Sincerely,
Benjamin Wong
Counsel

Encl. Order of the Court dated April 8, 2021, in John Turmel 
et al v Her Majesty the Queen
Order of the Court dated May 7, 2021, in Michel Denis Ethier 
v Her Majesty the Queen
Order of the Federal Court of Appeal dated August 9, 2021 in 
Michel Denis Ethier v Her Majesty the Queen

JCT: The Court issued a Direction Order: 

Date: 20220408
Docket: T-694-22
Toronto, Ontario, April 8, 2022
PRESENT: Prothonotary Trent Horne

BETWEEN:
                         ALIM MANJI
                                                  Plaintiff
                            and
                   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
                                                  Defendant

                           ORDER

UPON review of the statement of claim filed in this action;

AND UPON concluding that this action would benefit from 
being specially managed pursuant to Rule 383 of the Federal 
Courts Rules and from the appointment of a case management 
judge;

AND UPON the Court's own motion;

THIS COURT ORDERS that:

1. This action shall continue as a specially managed 
proceeding and be referred to the Office of the Chief 
Justice for the appointment of a case management judge. 
"Trent Horne"
Prothonotary

JCT: Instead of the Crown motion to strike taking a couple 
of weeks pursuant to the regular court rules, appointing a 
Case Management Judge allows them to stall the motion. Judge 
Aylen stalled it 5 months instead of the 2 weeks it should 
have taken.

Alim just sent me more good news: 
    Just got back from a freedom fighter get together. 
    Another 15 or so signed up for the federal suit!!

JCT: That's going to shock the Crown. Imagine, Alim got 
another 15 people to join the $2 protest at one meeting. 
Hope they spread the word with him. 

http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19111.txt is my latest report on the 
Crown motion to strike before the Crown found out about the 
others. 

Remember, it only costs $2 for all the new filers who will 
be stayed and if the Lead Plaintiff loses, they get 
dismissed without any further costs. There is no cheaper way 
to protest the mandates and try to bring the false alarm to 
Canada's attention. Imagine if the New Blue Party candidates 
in the upcoming June 2 election who are against the mandates 
joined the action. Wouldn't that make the news and probably 
win them the election to ask the court to declare the false 
alarm. 

Remember, when they call off the air travel ban, they're 
going to want to dismiss our claims as mooted by delivery of 
what we wanted. So move your buns and get your Gold Star 
souvenir for a lousy $2 before it's too late. 

If anyone needs help, Alim has a channel at 
https://discord.com/channels/825414160569466900/829032066216755230