TURMEL: Letter to 22 Mpps who voted against lockdown Honorable Members who voted against extended lockdown: I am John Turmel, B. Eng., Great Canadian Gambler and "The Professor" from the Trump Taj Mahal, accredited expert witness in Mathematics of Gambling by the Federal Tax Court of Canada. Toronto Star Mar 4 2020: WHO said the latest mortality rate for the virus is 3.4%. This is well above the seasonal flu, which has a mortality rate of under 0.1%. 3.4 is 34 times worse than a tenth portending over 2 million Covid deaths compared to the 60,000 US deaths in an average Flu season. Presuming WHO was talking about the same mortality rates! There are three different death rates: - MR: Mortality Rate, Deaths per Population; - IFR: Infection Fatality Rate, Deaths in Infected Group; - CFR: Case Fatality Rate, Deaths in hospital Cases. Gateway Pundit dug deeper and reported "WHO didn't compare Apple to Apple." I agreed we've been duped by the most elementary statistical trick of all, WHO compared the Covid Apple to the Flu Orange. Covid's 3.4% was its CFR, its IFR was not known. Flu's IFR is the well-known 0.1% stated in the article, 1/1,000 chance of dying if you get infected, symptoms or not. But only 1% of that thousand, 1/100 become hospitalized Cases. 1/10th of Cases die. 10% CFR. So 1 death per 1,000 Infected and 1 death per 10 hospitalized Cases shows Flu's historical IFR = 0.1% and CFR = 10%! WHO comparing Covid's CFR not to Flu's CFR but to its hundredfold smaller IFR is a hundredfold error. Gateway Pundit showed the world was suckered by an Apple Orange Comparison, a delusion that has been tough to dispel. It is not enough to simply bemoan the pain if you can be righteously angry. Being tricked twice is really just Cause of Anger. Adding insult to injury, Wuhan tested 10 million and found ZERO asymptomatic transmission. There were no surprised clusters of family and friends infected by an asymptomatic and therefore no reason for social distanced masks. Tricked for another righteous Cause of Anger. They not only Apple- Oranged the danger but then Apple-Aired the transmission. On Jan 19th, 2021, I brought their statistical Apple-Orange trickery to justice by filing a $2 Statement of Claim in Federal Court of Canada asking for an injunction against any and all Covid restrictions or an exemption from them and cash damages for the pain caused by leaders duped into locking us down. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19flyer.pdf is a flyer detailing our http://facebook.com/groups/appleorangeresistance http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19scjct.pdf is my Statement of Claim detailing the 6 main Causes of Anger: - Apple-Orange Comparison; - No Asymptomatic Transmission; - CTV 166 deaths not in long-term-care down memory hole; - PCR False Positives - CDC Death Certificates with Covid over lightning strike. - HCQ alternative smeared to enable experimental vaccines! I have written Federal Court templates used twice before by over 300 self-represented Plaintiffs in 2014 before Justice Phelan and again in 2017 before Justice Brown. This time, a Magnificent Seventy Seven have used a template to file a Cause of Anger differing only by the damages each claimed. The statistical gist is from my Lead Action T-130-21. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19ins.pdf has the template instructions. It's 15 minutes to fill in the and upload it to the Registry's website. Biggest bonus, there are no legal costs if it loses! On April 8 2021, Case Management Judge Prothonotary Mandy Aylen ordered all new claims be immediately stayed pending determination of my lead action. If a judge agrees lockdowns were not justified, damages claims continue. If I lose, I'll owe some costs but no one will, the stayed may abandon with no costs! or continue on their own. Sadly, while lifting the burden off the Crown of serving you your own personalized motion to strike your action and serving only the Lead, she refused to order that you be sent the motion documentation though she ordered you get a final decision on the documentation you won't get before you have to decide whether to continue on. She pointed out you could ask the Registry to send you a copy or John Turmel's site would have them: http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19docs http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19reps are my reports on documents. I appreciate your vote defending us from extended lockdowns but it's time to go on offence to win the war. People are dying over a trick and the Court is slow-walking the proof. It's no defence to chant "We need freedom,"or "It hurts too much" when we're told: "Lockdown is for your own greater good," "You fudged the numbers to trick us" is valid reason to go on offence with righteous Cause of Anger. Going on offense fortifies the soul. "What you're doing is stupid!" is better than "What you're doing hurts!" It is time to admit to being duped and help dispel the illusion for others by filing to ask a Federal Court judge to call off any restrictions not also applied to the more deadly Flu. We don't need to be ordered to stay away from Grannie if we've got sniffles, we can do that on our own. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19cnm.pdf is the Crown's June 7 2021 Motion to Strike for no Cause of Anger. I must respond by June 22. And then 10 more days until July 2 for their Reply and the motion to strike the Lead Action goes to a judge. I would have liked to include affidavit evidence in my Strike Motion Response but the Crown never actually said any allegation was wrong for which I could provide evidence to rebut! The Crown just listed all our allegations and did a general smear that everything is all just "speculation, bald allegations or conclusory statements of law dressed up as facts; irrelevant and incomprehensible statements, spurious, extreme, scandalous allegations." Just so obviously wrong he doesn't have to say why. Not one conclusion tied to any particular allegation. If the strike motion fails and the claims proceed, the Crown must then file a Statement of Defence. Her Majesty missed the Feb 18 deadline and is now in Default. I then Reply in 10 days closing the pleadings. Then affidavits are filed so the facts backing up the allegations are put before the Court after the Statement of Defence. As you read the Crown's motion to strike, note the material facts said to be lacking aren't due until after the pleadings are closed, not before. It doesn't matter though. To strike, the Crown must presume the allegations that our leaders were duped is true and still show that we have ZERO Cause of Anger. Yet, a judge might decide 77 plaintiffs complaining about an Apple-Orange comparison can be quietly dismissed with "Grape to Watermelon, it's all comparing fruit to me." It wouldn't be so easy for the court to ignore 77,000 plaintiffs complaining about the CFR-IFR metrics being Watermelon- Graped. Check the numbers in my claim and if you agree that we were duped, then file one, sit back with nothing to lose and everything to gain and see if a Math Expert can convince the judge that lockdowns were unjustified and that you should be granted damages for the pain our incompetent leaders have subjected us to. You'll have the Great Canadian Gambler to make the statistical case. I think it serendipitous to have found a cost-less way for no-lockdowners to have their voices heard in the right forum with a nice certified Gold Star Statement of Claim as a trophy for having generated a couple of files in the Resistance to the Apple-Orange Comparison. I am also noted for running and losing a Guinness Record 101 elections to reprogram the Bank of Canada to give everyone interest-free credit cards http://SmartestMan.Ca/1974 and leave it to posterity to decide whether I was the fool to keep offering or the electors were the fools for not saying yes... had they heard! It is interesting that 6 years after I took out the site SmartestManOnEarth.Ca, SmartestMan.Ca for short, that I should now be the only science graduate on the planet who caught the Apple-Orange Mal-Comparison! I ask you 22 members to join our Cause of Anger and lead your supporters in venting our displeasure at being duped to a court of justice, where it should be heard. Enough protesting in the streets. If we have any hope of ending the pain, how they tricked us must go viral. How the whole world was tricked should be first found in Canada? I was fined $880 for attending the April 3 2021 Brantford lockdown protest facing a driver's license suspension if I don't pay. I was passing out the orange flyers http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19flyer.pdf detailing our http://facebook.com/groups/appleorangeresistance It's far safer to get government's attention not by civil disobedience but by an avalanche of paperwork flooding the Ministry and Registry with files; with no further cost than the original $2 fee? So should your supporters be urged to defend an $880 ticket from the cops in the streets or to file a claim for a $2 filing fee to ask a judge for remedy with no other cost in the court? The silver lining is that the Apple-Orange ruse is so elementary that once you've seen the CFR-IFR trick, you can't unsee it. So the numbers of those having the scamdemic delusion dispelled can only grow. So someday, all will be asked: 1) When did you first hear about the CFR/IFR Apple-Orange trick? 2) What did you do? Help call off lockdown or take the jab? Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Jill Andrew Toronto-St. Paul's Roman Baber York Centre Stephen Blais OrlC)ans Lucille Collard Ottawa Vanier Michael Coteau Don Valley East Catherine Fife Waterloo John Fraser Ottawa South France Gelinas Nickel Belt Faisal Hassan York Southb-Weston Randy Hillier Lanark-Frontenac-Kingston Andrea Horwath Hamilton Centre Belinda C. Karahalios Cambridge Bhutila Karpoche Parkdale-High Park Terence Kernaghan London North Centre Sol Mamakwa Kiiwetinoong Mike Schreiner Guelph Amanda Simard Glengarry-Prescott-Russell Jennifer (Jennie) Stevens St. Catharines Monique Taylor Hamilton Mountain John Vanthof Timiskaming-Cochrane Jamie West Sudbury Kathleen O. Wynne Don Valley West