TURMEL: Announcing Turmel Nightly Covid News CENSOR WOES After having suffered more alerts about being "false" or "partly false" or "missing pretext" (without stating what's "false" or "partly false" or "missing what pretext," and not telling me how I'm being censored, I've decided the only way to get around them is to go a series of videos uploaded to my site so even if a social media platform takes them down, they can still be found. I have 2 channels, KingofthePaupers and SmartestManSays with all of them listed at http://SmartestMan.Ca/kotp (King Of The Paupers) Newer videos will be hosted at my SmartestMan.Ca/ page. TRUMP ELECTION WIN VIDEO TAKEDOWN Online censorship has gotten worse especially after Youtube took down my video (without strike) that would have ensured Trump's election win had he seen how to "Lift the Charlottesville Nazi smear off Trumpers' backs!" On Nov 9, 5 days after the election. Dilbert's Scott Adams in Episode 1182 said 3 times that if Trump had just done this one thing, it would have lifted the Charlottesville Nazi target off Trumpers' backs. I posted the "Lift the Charlottesville Nazi Target off Trumpers' backs" on Oct 13, two weeks before the election. If Trump had seen the video, would he have won the election as Adams says? Decide for yourself: I posted the censored video at Rumble: https://rumble.com/ve4xp1-lift-the-charlottesville-nazi-target-off-trumpers-backs.html My very last video was on how Youtube took down the video with no community strike. Quietly! Surrepticiously. Youtube downs "How Trump Wins" video quietly, no strike https://rumble.com/vf0o03-youtube-downs-how-trump-wins-video-quietly-no-strike.html https://youtu.be/8Gty4JsscWQ VIDEOS TO HOMEPAGE I'm tired of worrying about and fighting off the censors on social media. So I will still upload to my regular Youtube, Rumble and Facebook video depositories but I'll also have a link to a copy at my home page should it be taken down. http://SmartestMan.Ca/kotp has all my videos http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19vids has Covid videos COVID APPLE ORANGE COMPARISON HOAX Social media have banned talk of Covid being a hoax. I've had several videos removed as against their guidelines. They think following WHO is going to make their being wrong all okay when we bring them to trial. I don't think the families of the dead will be so agreeable to the idea. Thinks about all those people who dies after being dissuaded from taking Vitamin D, HCQ, Zinc, Ivermectin! I think there may be some vengeful families and "the doctors we censored didn't agree with WHO" may not cut it as an alibi. Anyway, I'm against the death penalty though I've love Zuckerberg and Dorsey to get it so someone can commute it. At least it should be known that they deserved it even if we're too humane to do it to those who slaughtered so many while they wielded power over the mike. COURT DOINGS And with so much going on in the courts with the Ethier appeal of not getting the lesser solution, with my appeal of allowing an incomplete motion lacking Memorandum (Written Representations) until later; and now the Crown's defence having nothing to do with the Claim of Hoax but with the Lead Plaintiff's old costs owed! So they want a a new Lead Plaintiff and Wong kept us in lockdown from the start and now more months? TIMELINE Remember, I file the Lead Statement of Claim on Jan 19 2021. Statement of Defence was due on Feb 18. So a properly filed motion to strike should have been filed by Feb 18 before default giving me 10 days til Feb 28 for my Response Record, say I did it in 4-6 days rush, Feb 22-4, and 4 days for their Reply Record and it would have been on a judge's desk by end of February. Settled in last February if they had filed the motion before going into default of Statement of Defence! There is no Rule that says that a letter of intent from the Defendant to file a motion to strike the claim substitutes for bringing an actual Motion Record. They act like their intent to file a motion calls off the timetable set in the rules. THREE MONTHS WASTED SO FAR Three extra months worth of lockdown deaths can be attributed to the Minstry of Justice and the Federal Court. Had the rules been followed, the world would have found out how they'd been hoaxed 3 months ago and maybe put an end to it. Substuting their "intention" to file a motion instead filing a motion left no timetable to be followed. Intending to file means no deadline to file. Of course, the deadline for the Motion to Strike had to be the same deadline for the Statement of Defence. In order to legally avoid having ot file a Statement of Defence, the challenge to strike should be actually filed, not thought to be filed. A Motion is comprised of 4 parts: 1) RECORD of Motion: Covers and Table of Contents; 2) NOTICE of Motion: What is sought on what grounds; 3) AFFIDAVIT: Facts to be discussed 4) MEMORANDUM ARGUMENT of how facts back up what's sought in the Notice. Case Management Judge Aylen came up with the idea of having timeline other than the one in the Rules. Why ask for one if it's already in the Rules unless she doesn't like the one in the rules. Because the Crown has sought to have the motion arguments presented in writting, the Memorandum of arguments is referred to as Written Representations of arguments. It should have been called Memorandum in Writting So the Rules discuss Memorandum except under S.369 where it's in writing and called Written Representations. And we're in writing. But sadly, the judge has accepted where the motion is brought upon the filing of a 2) Notice and 3) Affidavits without 1) Record or 4) Memorandum. Demanding my response to that incomplete record has seriously disadvantaged me. After the Crown filed 2) and 3), CMJ Aylen suggested 27 days for me to file my 3) affidavits. Then another 15 days before the Crown files a completed Motion Record. So 42 days, 6 weeks, before I get to see how their affidavit plays and 4 weeks after I have to present my cards. 6-WEEK WASTE CUT TO 2-WEEKS But my alerting the Crown that I will not file affidavits nor examine theirs on an incomplete Motion Record has cut out the 27 affidavit days leaving the Crown only 15 days after May 21. So Motion Record Due date is Monday June 7. So CMJ Aylen's timetable only wasted an extra 2 weeks, not the full 6 weeks intended to be wasted if I'd fallen for it. My Response Record due in 10 days after Jun 7 is June 17th, and the Crown's Reply Record due in 4 days by June 21. So instead of filing a complete Motion Record on Feb 18, (Record, Notice, Affidavit, Memorandum) before going into default, they've managed to stretch it to June 7. Feb 18 to June 7, 109 days, over 15 extra weeks from when the complete Record should have been filed. And they tried to stretch it to 19 weeks with out-of-place affdidavit doings. NIGHTLY NEWS So the first few days, I'll be doing Covid news, and after I'll be doing recent developments in the Federal Court case. So I'm going to do a nightly taping on recent news and to avoid any problems with Youtube and Facebook, even Rumble, I'll have a link at my site. And I'd ask you to download it for future reference. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL LOSERS Of course, most of the news is going to be of our Federal Court case which I believe is far more on-target than all the other "not-on-target" court actions elsewhere so far. I will make fun of them as well as the others resisting the lockdowns in their own loser fashions. Like I've learned to explain to people, when they say: "Lockdown is for your own good," a chant for "Freedom" is no answer. "It's too harsh" is no answer to challenge their good intentions. But "You fudged the numbers," that's an answer to their bad intentions. Our goal is to get our facts of the Apple Orange comparison out. Once people get that, they have the right to be angry. You don't have the right to be angry at people locking you down for your own good. QUESTION, COMMENTS, RUDE REMARKS I'll check the videos for any questions, comments, rude remarks, my email to johnturmel@yahoo.com and then respond to them in the next show. Which could go over half-an-hour, as long as it takes. ACTION HEATING UP By now, I don't think anyone can say that this hasn't turned out to be one very interesting court process! For those who filed a claim, you found out you're cut out of the loop. You have a right to the motion to strike your claim but now it's been taken away and you have to put in more effort to find out what they're arguing against your claim. MAGNIFICENT SEVENTY SEVEN GETTING SCREWED Prothonotary Aylen made sure if you miss something, you won't be able to find it in your email folder. Sending you a copy was too much of a burden on the Crown as she lifted the greater burden of them sending you your own personalized motion to strike your action. They just want to send one and have its results applied to you without sending it to you. And the judge said yes. Lifted the burden off the Crown and put it onto you. You just will never ever be shafted in the courts like you are being shafted here now. UPCOMING COURT DATES 1) Ethier's appeal dismissed on May 7, may appeal by June 6. Thinking on Ethier's appeal, am I happy with her cutting you out of your due? Making you angry every time you put in extra effort to find out what's going on instead of her obliging the lesser burden of a lousy copy if not the larger burden of a personalized motion. 2) Turmel's appeal on whether Motion Record filed forthwith on 17th, Crown must respond by May 27th, I Reply by May 31st, sooner if I can. Judgment early June. 3) And the Crown's complete Motion Record by June 7, then I get 15 days I won't need, and they get another 7 days. So we're asking the court to tell the Crown to hop-to-it with the Motion Record only 5 days before they have to file it! If you wonder why, over a lousy 5 days, it's to get it on record how CMJ Aylen allowed them to file an incomplete motion broken into two parts to stall and put me at a disadvantage. And it's only days because I waived the proffered chance to file affidavits of my own in 17 days without a completed record and then have 10 more days for examinations on them, 27 days! Before the 15 more days for Crown. The Complete Record which should have been filed by Feb 18 before default and will be filed by June 7, almost 4 months after going into default. WHY HER MAJESTY IN DEFAULT Why would the Crown play the whole claim in default?? Because they have no defence to the fraudulent use of statistics and stalling is all they have. It's tougher to stall when people are dying due to the delay. LOCKDOWN BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS My appeal of the delays in the proposed timeline is the first I've mentioned at the blood on this court's processes. We have an easily-provable statistical hoax behind a lockdown that's killing people and destroying our society. And Crown Wong and Prothonotary Aylen know. They've read it. it's Judgment Day for anyone who reads it! How can anyone of integrity be shown that a pack of lies and exaggerations have tricked them into deadly lockdowns and do nothing? Most are scared by the Forces Of Evil. I know. I'll say one good thing about talking on the hustings. When you're out there in crowds repeating your winning points, you hone your arguments, find things that make them laugh and better understand and when they laugh, they got the point. Which is why media so often report people laughing "at me." It's really "at my jokes" or "with me" but the media are right that my patter does make people laugh, lots. Show-stealing lines! A favorite: Liberal Candidate: "UN says Canada is a top place to live." Retort: "They don't live here" busted up the room. CROWN LAWYING BUT NO PROBLEM WITH FACTS So far, you've noticed lots of lawying by the Crown but nothing wrong with our facts. When our facts are known, who's going to deny them? Do we really care what the Crown is going to tell the judge about the need for more facts if 50,000 more sign up? So tomorrow May 27th, the Crown gets to explain why I should present defence against an incomplete motion record? And why they should get so much time after they're in default? I'll try to respond by Friday giving the court plenty of time to decide whether the motion should be completed forthwith before their June 7 due date or not. The Court could just wait until after June 7 and then say that the issue is mooted. So I'm taking it to private video so public video can't shut me down. I'll do a recap of everything before the new stuff.