TURMEL: Judge Diner nixes email metadata, wants affidavit of service

JCT: For the past few years, I have uploaded the metadata 
from an email to the Crown to acknowledge service and then 
wrote a letter to the judge asking the registry to accept 
it in lieu of an affidavit of service. For the Appellant/Plaintiff
John C. Turmel, B.Eng., 
May 17 2021 

To a Judge:  
     re: T-130-21 

To the Administrator: 
Please place this letter before a judge of the Court: 

Your Honor 
Please accept the email c19a2service.pdf to be filed as 
proof of service on the Defendant. This proof of service was 
accepted by Justice Brown for many online filings in the 
past few years and twice in the recent Appeal Motion and 
Reply of Michel Ethier. 
Given the lockdown situation, I hope it is deemed 
acceptable.

JCT: So I tried it for my appeal motion for the timetable. 

Federal Court CANADA 
May 20th, 2021
VIA E-MAIL
John C. Turmel
Benjamin Wong

RE: T-130-21
 JOHN C. TURMEL v. HMQ
________________________________________________________________________
Please be advised of the following oral direction issued by 
Justice Diner dated May 20th, 2021:
    "Mr. Turmel be instructed to submit a proper Affidavit 
    of Service, and upon receipt of the Affidavit of Service 
    the Motion can be accepted for filing as of the date it 
    was submitted (May 17, 2021)."

JCT: Judge Brown accepted it dozens of times Michel Ethier 
had his metadata for his appeal motion and reply accepted by 
his judge, but Justice Diner needs me to swear before a 
commissioner of oaths that I sent it to the Crown. Proof of 
email not good enough. 

So I have to run around to find a Notary to commission my 
oath when I swear "I did email it to the Crown." That's 
better than the metadata To: From: Date: Title: 

Affidavit of Service are "make-work" for lawyers and 
notaries. If I ran a legal system, I'd make a rule that 
every document filed is presumed to be true. But that 
wouldn't let lawyers do their lawying. So lawying is okay as 
long as you didn't swear you weren't lying. 

I could understand some kind if verification in the case of 
an inheritance estate, sure, a notary is still useful. But 
swearing that you served it on them, what's the purpose to 
an oath if saying you served them and you did not would be 
perjury too. 

So Judge Diner wants to make me run around. Email metadata 
not sufficient, needs me swearing an oath before the notary. 

What do you think. Would he have been another judge who 
thought adding a Carbon Copy to an email was too great a 
burden for the Crown to bear? 

I hope he's not the judge of my appeal motion. Didn't start 
off well.