TURMEL: Union of Dirty Dozen Covid restriction plaintiffs JCT: We're now up to a Dirty Dozen in the Covid Resistance http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19list The Crown has asked to file only one motion (without mentioning which Plaintiff to file it on) and not all the others. Here's the reply I filed today. John C. Turmel, B.Eng., Monday Feb 15 2021 VIA EMAIl & EFILING Federal Court Court Administrator: Dear Sir or Madam: re: John Turmel v. HMTQ T-130-21 I write in reply to the Defendant's Feb 11 2021 letter to request that my case and others like it be specially managed proceedings. This Plaintiff consents to Canada's request for leave to seek relief by way of a single motion to one plaintiff and not the others that would be applicable to all of the proceedings as long as the others receive all documentation by email. Only the Crown and the Registry know who has filed a similar c19sc-named pdf and it is virtually costless to make sure everyone gets a copy of everything filed in the dossier. The Defendant notes the parties may also require other procedural directions as the parties may also require other procedural directions as these claims unfold, that case- management would also be consistent with the Court's approach to past claims downloaded from the same website as the current claims. The past approach was to email the document to the Defendant, Efile it, and under service, submit a pdf of the metadata from "sent" email, and upload a letter requesting Judge Brown okay the email metadata rather than an affidavit of service. He always granted use of the metadata. I would ask the Court to order that the document and metadata pdfs may be filed without a letter to the judge asking to allow the metadata. The Defendant notes some plaintiffs have previous unpaid judgments and ask that security be posted. Considering the no-cash cost of emailling out a copy of the documentation, after the first case is decided, those plaintiffs could then decide if it is worth putting up security. Sincerely, John C. Turmel JCT: The process for almost 400 claims ran really smoothly under Judge Henry Brown. So I'd like the same except without wasting the judge's time. What's a judge going to say? Metadata isn't as good as an affidavit stating it was emailled. And I don't want to be responsible for watching the Regisry files to note anyone new in the Resistance. And it's easy for them. If they want to be saved sending you a paper copy, the least they should do is send you a emailled copy.